Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=30 Randomized Treatment

The Percutaneous Stem Cell Injection Delivery Effects on Neomyogenesis Pilot Study (The POSEIDON-Pilot Study)

Stem Cell Transplantation

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
43.3%
Results posted
May 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Incidence of TE-SAE Define as Composite of Death, Non-fatal MI, Stroke, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure, Cardiac Perforation, Pericardial Tamponade, Ventricular Arrhythmias >15 Sec. or With Hemodynamic Compromise or Atrial Fibrillation — 6.70; 6.70 percentage of participants — p=1.00

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Auto-hMSCs (Biological); Allo-hMSCs (Biological)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Miami
Primary completion
Apr 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Incidence of TE-SAE Define as Composite of Death, Non-fatal MI, Stroke, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure, Cardiac Perforation, Pericardial Tamponade, Ventricular Arrhythmias >15 Sec. or With Hemodynamic Compromise or Atrial Fibrillation
6.70; 6.70 1.00
SECONDARY
CT Infarct Size From Early Enhanced Defect: - Difference Between the Baseline and 13-month
-31.61; -34.93 0.75
SECONDARY
CT Measure of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
27.85; 26.23; 29.50; 28.53 >0.05
SECONDARY
CT Measure of End Diastolic Volume
260.26; 300.89; 243.66; 291.75 >0.05
SECONDARY
CT Measure of End Systolic Volume
191.95; 225.67; 175.99; 213.59 >0.05
SECONDARY
CT Measure of Scar Size as % of LV Mass
9.40; 10.71; 5.54; 5.92 >0.05
SECONDARY
Change in Distance Walked in 6-minutes From Baseline.
19.7; 65.8 0.87
SECONDARY
Change in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Total Score
-10.2; -13.0 0.84
SECONDARY
Change in New York Heart Association Class at 12-months
4; 7; 8; 6; 2; 1 0.55

Summary

The technique of transplanting progenitor cells into a region of damaged myocardium, termed cellular cardiomyoplasty, is a potentially new therapeutic modality designed to replace or repair necrotic, scarred, or dysfunctional myocardium. Ideally, graft cells should be readily available, easy to culture to ensure adequate quantities for transplantation, and able to survive in host myocardium; often a hostile environment of limited blood supply and immunorejection. Whether effective cellular regenerative strategies require that administered cells differentiate into adult cardiomyocytes and couple electromechanically with the surrounding myocardium is increasingly controversial, and recent evidence suggests that this may not be required for effective cardiac repair. Most importantly, transplantation of graft cells should improve cardiac function and prevent adverse ventricular remodeling. To date, a number of candidate cells have been transplanted in experimental models, including fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes, embryonic stem cell-derived myocytes, tissue engineered contractile grafts, skeletal myoblasts, several cell types derived from adult bone marrow, and cardiac precursors residing within the heart itself. There has been substantial clinical development in the use of whole bone marrow and skeletal myoblast preparations in studies enrolling both post-infarction patients, and patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. The effects of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have also been studied clinically. Currently, bone marrow or bone marrow-derived cells represent highly promising modality for cardiac repair. The totality of evidence from trials investigating autologous whole bone marrow infusions into patients following myocardial infarction supports the safety of this approach. In terms of efficacy, increases in ejection fraction are reported in the majority of the trials. Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction resulting from heart disease is a common and problematic condition; definitive therapy in the form of heart transplantation is available to only a tiny minority of eligible patients. Cellular cardiomyoplasty for chronic heart failure has been studied less than for acute MI, but represents a potentially important alternative for this disease.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to MI.
  • Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization.
  • Been treated with appropriate maximal medical therapy for heart failure or post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Ejection fraction between 20% and 50%.
  • Able to perform a metabolic stress test.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Baseline glomerular filtration rate 550 ms on screening ECG. In addition; patients with sustained or a short run of ventricular tachycardia on ECG or 48 hour Ambulatory ECG during the screening period will be removed from the protocol.
  • Documented unstable angina.
  • AICD firing in the past 60 days prior to the procedure.
  • Be eligible for or require coronary artery revascularization.
  • Have a hematologic abnormality as evidenced by hematocrit 1.3) not due to a reversible cause.
  • Known, serious radiographic contrast allergy.
  • Known allergies to penicillin or streptomycin.
  • Organ transplant recipient.
  • Clinical history of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., patients with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), except curatively-treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical carcinoma.
  • Non-cardiac condition that limits lifespan to < 1 year.
  • On chronic therapy with immunosuppressant medication.
  • Serum positive for HIV, hepatitis BsAg, or hepatitis C.
  • Female patient who is pregnant, nursing, or of child-bearing potential and not using effective birth control.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01087996). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search