Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=50 Treatment

Study to Determine if the Valiant Stent Graft is Safe and Effective in Treating Patients Who Have a Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury

Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury

Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
16.0%
Results posted
Mar 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: All-cause Mortality Within 30-days of the Index Procedure — 4 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Valiant Thoracic Stent Graft with the Captivia Delivery System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Primary completion
Apr 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
All-cause Mortality Within 30-days of the Index Procedure
4

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Valiant stent graft is safe and effective in treating patients who have a blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). BTAI is when the aorta has been injured due to traumatic force to the chest area. It is commonly caused by motor vehicle accidents. In most cases it is life threatening and the standard treatment is surgery. Many times when a person has a BTAI they also have other injuries that can affect the results of the surgery. Since stent grafting has been an effective way to treat other aortic conditions such as aneurysms (bulge in aorta wall), it is believed that the Valiant stent graft would be effective in treating BTAI. A stent graft is a woven polyester tube (graft) supported by a metal frame of strong but flexible nitinol (type of metal) springs (stent) that is placed in the aorta to help seal the injury and keep it from bleeding.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject had a blunt thoracic aortic injury which:
  • was confirmed, at a minimum, by diagnostic contrast-enhanced computerized tomography angiogram (CTA) and/or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA)
  • occurred no more than 30 days prior to the stent implant procedure
  • Subject was ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject or subject's legally authorized representative signed an IRB approved informed consent
  • Subject was hemodynamically stable
  • Subject's anatomy met all of the following anatomical criteria:
  • Aortic diameter (adventitia to adventitia) of the proximal and distal landing zones between 18 mm and 44 mm
  • Subject had patent iliac or femoral arteries or could tolerate an iliac conduit that allowed endovascular access to the injury site with the delivery system of the appropriate sized device
  • The centerline distance from the distal margin of left common carotid artery (LCC) to the injury was ≥ 20 mm

Exclusion Criteria

  • Planned placement of the COVERED portion of the stent graft over the celiac axis or the LCC, or in cases of bovine anatomy, innominate artery
  • Subject had systemic infection
  • Subject was pregnant
  • Subject had received a previous stent or stent graft or previous surgical repair in the DTA
  • Subject had a history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, or refuses blood transfusion
  • Subject was participating in an investigational drug or device clinical trial which would interfere with the endpoints and/or follow-ups of this study
  • Subject had a known allergy or intolerance to the device components
  • Subject had a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which was not amenable to pre-treatment
  • Subject was in extremis, defined as subject that had non-survivable injury/condition
  • Subject had a Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) within two (2) months prior to implant procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01092767). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search