Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=170

Gustin Gene Polymorphism and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste

Dysgeusia

Enrolled (actual)
170
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity — 85.19; 50.99; 25.00; 14.81 percentage of participants — p=<0.01

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Cagliari
Primary completion
Dec 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
85.19; 50.99; 25.00; 14.81; 35.71; 20 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration
57.3; 89.5; 149.64 <0.004 sig
SECONDARY
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI
20.3; 20.76; 22.58 <0.048 sig
SECONDARY
Electrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity
97,08867; 75,42000; 48,48231 < 0.00001 sig
SECONDARY
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density
51.66; 33.49; 18.53 < 0.00001 sig
SECONDARY
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
18; 2; 40; 20; 6; 42 < 0.00001 sig

Summary

The investigators evaluate the possible association of PROP taste with gustin gene polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G), salivary zinc ion concentration and BMI. In addition, it has also been evaluated PROP taste sensitivity by recording monophasic potentials from the tongue.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • no variation of body weight > 5 kg over the last 3 mo BMI within 20-25 Age between 20-30

Exclusion Criteria

  • gustatory impairment following a prescribed diet or using medications that might interfere with taste perception food allergies smokers
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01097915). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search