N/A
Completed N=60
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
Endotracheal Intubation
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01099969 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Intubation Time — 60.2; 48.8; 58.6; 40.7 seconds
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Endotrol Tube compared to the conventional endotracheal tube in conjunction with the GlideRite stylet (Verathon Medical Inc, USA) during videolaryngoscopy assisted endotracheal intubation using a McGrath (Aircraft Medical Ltd., and distributed in the US by LMA North America, Inc.) video laryngoscope or a GlideScope (Verathon Medical Inc, USA). The investigators hypothesize that using the Endotrol tracheal tube, (Covidien, Colorado, USA) is safer and more efficacious than using the conventional endotracheal tube during McGrath video laryngoscope and/or GlideScope aided endotracheal intubation.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Intubation Time |
60.2; 48.8; 58.6; 40.7 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Intubation Attempts |
13; 14; 14; 13; 1; 0 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Difficult Intubations |
1; 0; 2; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Cormack and Lehane Grade of Laryngeal View |
12; 11; 13; 13; 2; 4 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Age: 18-80 years old
- ASA: I-III
- Mallampati: I-III
- Mouthopening: 2 FB or 80 years
- ASA: IV
- Mallampati: IV
- Mouthopening < 2 FB 4cm
- No risk for aspiration
- No respiratory infection in past 10 days
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01099969). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.