N/A
N=74
Cyanoacrylate and Laser and Dentin Sensitivity
Dentin Hypersensitivity · Dentin Sensitivity
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01111474 ↗Enrolled (actual)
74
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Change of the Pain Sensitivity — 7.77; 7.49; 2.57; 2.36 score on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Cyanoacrylate (Other); Laser (Radiation)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 12+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Federal University of São Paulo
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change of the Pain Sensitivity |
7.77; 7.49; 2.57; 2.36 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Improvement |
16.87; 16.87; 12.05; 12.05 | — |
Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatments for dental hypersensitivity: cyanoacrylate (Super Bonder®) compared with use of low intensity laser treatment (LILT). As the cyanoacrylate is a lower cost treatment, the hypothesis in investigation is if this product is equally effective as the laser treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- patients should be in good general and dental health;
- present complaints of dental sensitivity to cold, sweet, acidic foods and brushing;
- present complaints of pain in teeth located in different quadrants;
- manifest pain or discomfort upon application of the triple syringe air jet;
- not be in current use of desensitizing agents.
Exclusion Criteria
- presence of extensive restorations and carious lesions in the sensitive teeth;
- undergoing orthodontic treatment;
- frequent use of analgesics, antidepressants and anti-inflammatory drugs;
- presence of gingival inflammation;
- non-consent of patient.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01111474). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.