N/A
N=40
Comparative Study of Sham Versus Mild® Procedure in Patients Diagnosed With Symptomatic Lumbar Central Canal Stenosis
Lumbar Spine Stenosis Central Canal
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01129921 ↗Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4 — 11; 2 participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression (Device); Sham lumbar decompression (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Napa Pain Institute
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4 |
9; 5; 12; 5 | — |
| PRIMARY Visual Analog Scale (VAS) <=4 |
9; 5; 12; 5 | — |
| PRIMARY Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Mean Improvement |
2.3; 2.2 | — |
Summary
This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind, clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with mild® devices versus sham in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis. Sham patients were eligible to choose to cross-over and have the actual decompression procedure after week 6 exam.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Symptomatic and lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy.
- Prior failure of conservative therapy and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score of >20%.
- Radiologic evidence of LSS, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (typically > 2.5mm)confirmed by pre op MRI and/or CT.
- Central canal cross sectional area clearly reduced per MRI/CT report.
- If present, anterior listhesis ≤ 5.0mm (preferred) and stable.
- Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain.
- Available to complete 26 weeks of follow-up.
- A signed Informed consent Form is obtained from the subject.
- Adults at least 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
- Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
- History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms as determined by the Investigator.
- Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
- Disk protrusion or osteophyte formation severe enough to confound study outcome.
- Facet hypertrophy severe enough to confound study outcome.
- Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants.
- Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) within five days of treatment.
- Epidural steroid administration within prior 3 weeks(of procedure or sham)
- Inability of the subject to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
- Metabolic wound healing pathologies deemed by Investigator to compromise study outcome.
- Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent.
- Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding.
- On Workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01129921). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.