Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=32

Effects of Cataract Extraction Surgery and Limbal Relaxing Incision on Corneal Sensation and Dry Eye

Dry Eye

Enrolled (actual)
32
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jul 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: The Percentage of Subjects at Month 3 With Corneal Sensitivity < 50 Millimeters (mm) at Any of the Locations Measured — 13; 13; 21.7; 13 Percentage of Subjects

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cataract Surgery and Limbal relaxing incision (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Allergan
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Percentage of Subjects at Month 3 With Corneal Sensitivity < 50 Millimeters (mm) at Any of the Locations Measured
13; 13; 21.7; 13; 8.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score at Month 3
15.739; -9.826
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Month 3
0.652; 0.261
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining at Month 3
1.087; -0.174
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time at Month 3
16.4; -3.71
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Schirmer's Test at Month 3
11.091; 0.909

Summary

This is a multicenter evaluation of the effects of the cataract extraction and limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) on corneal sensation and dry eye signs and symptoms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient scheduled to undergo clear corneal cataract extraction with planned limbal relaxing incision for correction of a corneal astigmatism

Exclusion Criteria

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Have undergone refractive surgery or any surgery involving a limbal or corneal incision
  • Use of topical cyclosporine (Restasis) within three months of baseline/randomization visit
  • Temporary or permanent occlusion of the lacrimal puncta
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01161771). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search