Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=63 Randomized Treatment

Safety and Efficacy of the TransDiscal System Versus Medical Management in Treating Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain

Back Pain

Enrolled (actual)
63
Serious AEs
6.4%
Results posted
Mar 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Average Daily Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score Between Screening and Follow up. — -2.4; -0.56 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
TransDiscal System (Device); Medical Management (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Halyard Health
Primary completion
Dec 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Average Daily Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score Between Screening and Follow up.
-2.4; -0.56
SECONDARY
Percentage of Study Group Subjects With Greater Than 2 Points Decrease or 30% Drop in Average Daily Pain Related Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score.
50; 18
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Score of Short Form 36-Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) From Screening to 6 Month Follow up Visit
18; 1.7
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Score of EuroQuol 5d Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5d VAS) Between Screening and 6 Month Follow up Visit
15; 6
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Score of Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) Between Screening and 6 Month Follow up Visit
0.39; -0.23
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Score of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Between Screening and 6 Month Follow up Visit
-1.7; 0.3
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Score of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Between Screening and 6 Month Follow up Visit
-11; 0.22

Summary

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TransDiscal System (TDS) in treating discogenic pain of the lumbar spine using a modified disc biacuplasty procedure. The primary efficacy measure will be the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 months post treatment/randomization and the TransDiscal System will be compared against medical management (standard of care).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥21 years
  • Able to understand the informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
  • Objective measurements indicating functional impairment related to low back pain
  • Stabilized on pain medication regimen for >2 months as defined by a 6 months) unresponsive to non-operative care (including physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medication, epidurals, diagnostic facet joint/medial branch blocks, and sacroiliac joint interventions as performed or deemed appropriate by the Investigator)
  • Score ≥5 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) relating specifically to the average daily low back pain
  • Back pain more prominent than leg pain which is commonly exacerbated by flexion or bending or prolonged sitting.
  • Single level concordant pain reproduction present on lumbar discography in desiccated disc. Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) image also supports discography findings. Changes in other disc spaces in the lumbar region do not demonstrate neural compressive lesion.
  • Disc height at least 50% of adjacent control disc

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of compressive radiculopathy with predominant leg pain
  • Evidence of nucleus pulposus herniation or free disc fragments on MRI
  • Evidence of > 2 discs dessicated based on MRI or symptomatic involvement of more than one lumbar disc levels.
  • Asymptomatic disc bulges > 5 mm at the treatment level.
  • Prior lumbar surgery of any kind at the treatment level (micro-discectomies, and/or minimally invasive procedures at other levels that are not excluded)
  • Prior spinal fusion below the T10 Level
  • Symptoms or signs of lumbar canal stenosis at any level
  • Evidence of structural abnormality at the lumbar level (except non-symptomatic spondylolysis resulting in spondylolithesis no more than Grade 1 upon flexion and extension)
  • Any generalized pain or multifocal pain, conversion or multiple non-anatomical complaints
  • Pending or active compensation claim, litigation or disability income remuneration (secondary gain)
  • Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction
  • Beck's Depression Index (BDI) score >20
  • Current pregnancy, recent delivery (within 3 months of consent) or the intent of becoming pregnant during the study period.
  • Systemic or localized infection at the anticipated needle entry site (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved)
  • Discitis
  • Allergies to any medication to be used in the procedure
  • Present symptomatic lumbar spinal fracture
  • History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable
  • Progressive neurological deficits
  • Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance abuse or alcohol abuse
  • Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to >120 mg of morphine per 24 hours
  • Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome [AIDS], cancer, diabetes, etc.)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >32.5 kg/m^2
  • Participating in another clinical trial/investigation 30 days prior to signing informed consent
  • Negative or indeterminate lumbar discography results as assessed per International Spine Intervention Society (ISIS) guidelines
  • Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01263054). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search