N/A
N=16
Differential Diagnosis for the Causes of Subclavian Steal for Patients With Vascular Access in the Forearm
Subclavian Steal
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01263301 ↗Enrolled (actual)
16
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Change of Subclavian Flow to Normal Flow Pattern During Cuff Test — 0; 2 participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- carotid duplex (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Mennonite Christian Hospital
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change of Subclavian Flow to Normal Flow Pattern During Cuff Test |
0; 2 | — |
| PRIMARY no Change of Subclavian Arterial Flow During Cuff Test |
5; 0 | — |
| PRIMARY Change of Vertebral Flow to Normal Flow Pattern During Cuff Test |
0; 2 | — |
| PRIMARY no Change of Vertebral Arterial Flow During Cuff Test |
5; 0 | — |
Summary
Subclavian steal phenomenon is normally observed in patients with stenosis of subclavian artery proximal to orifice of vertebral artery(V0). However, uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis using vascular access in the arm or forearm may also develop dialysis associated steal syndrome(DASS).For patients with symptomatic subclavian steal phenomenon, the treatment for these two groups is different. The investigators want to see if the investigators can use noninvasive duplex examination instead of invasive conventional angiography to do the differential diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- patients who revealed subclavian steal in the duplex study
Exclusion Criteria
- patients who has vascular access in the arm instead of the forearm
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01263301). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.