Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=250 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of a Sore Throat Lozenge Containing Lidocaine and Cetylpyridinium Chloride in Patients With Sore Throat Due to a Common Cold.

Sore Throat Due to a Common Cold

Enrolled (actual)
250
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Jul 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity — -27.4; -26.9 mm

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Lidocaine 8mg + CPC 2mg (Drug); Lidocaine 1mg + CPC 2mg (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Novartis
Primary completion
Apr 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity
-27.4; -26.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline Sore Throat Pain Intensity up to 240 mn Post-dose
-25.5; -29.1

Summary

This study will compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a lidocaine 8 mg + cetylpyridimium chloride (CPC) 2 mg lozenge with a single dose of a lidocaine 1 mg + CPC 2 mg lozenge in the treatment of sore throat due to a common cold.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with sore throat due to an upper respiratory tract infection, with recent onset (within 48 hours)
  • Sore throat of at least moderate pain intensity

Exclusion Criteria

  • - History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs and listed excipients or to drugs of similar chemical classes
  • Evidence of mouth breathing or severe coughing
  • Evidence of overt oropharyngeal bacterial or fungal infection or evidence of lower respirator tract infection
  • Severe renal, liver or cardiac impairment
  • Severe lung disease
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01265446). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search