Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=166 Randomized Single-blind Screening

Study to Evaluate a Contact Lens Lubricating and Rewetting Drop

Dry Eye

Enrolled (actual)
166
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Eyes With Graded Slit Lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2. — 1; 0 eyes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Lubricating and Rewetting Drops (Device); AMO Blink Contacts Lubricant Eye Drops (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Eyes With Graded Slit Lamp Findings Greater Than Grade 2.
1; 0

Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the product performance of investigational lubricating and rewetting drops.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have physiologically normal anterior segments not exhibiting clinically significant biomicroscopy findings.
  • Adapted wearers of soft contact lenses, wear a lens in each eye, and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand.
  • Use a lens care system on a regular basis.
  • Wear their habitual lenses (or be willing to wear lenses) a minimum of 8 hours per day.
  • Willing to use drops 4 times per day.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participating in a conflicting study.
  • An active ocular disease, any corneal infiltrative response, or are using any ocular medications.
  • Any scar or neovascularization within the central 4mm of the cornea.
  • Any grade 2 or greater finding during the slit lamp examination
  • Using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Aphakic.
  • Amblyopic.
  • Allergic to any component in the study care products.
  • Have had any corneal surgery.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01267656). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search