Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=224 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Safety and Efficacy of Two Types of Botulinum Toxin Type A For the Treatment of Glabellar Lines

Glabellar Lines

Enrolled (actual)
224
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 28 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) — 108; 106 Number of Subjects

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
botulinum toxin type A (Biological)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Allergan
Primary completion
Jan 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 28 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)
108; 106
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 84 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
90; 80
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 98 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
76; 70
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 112 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
61; 56
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 28 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
108; 102
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 84 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
84; 78
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 98 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
73; 68
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 112 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS
61; 54

Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different types of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Moderate to severe glabellar frown lines

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis or Eaton Lambert syndrome
  • Aesthetic treatment with botulinum toxin within 6 months or planned treatment with botulinum toxin for any reason during the study
  • Prior filler treatments, surgeries, insertion procedures in/to the glabellar region
  • Facial cosmetic procedures in the glabellar area within 6 months
  • Bleeding disorders or use of anticoagulants within 10 days
  • History of facial nerve palsy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01271452). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search