Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=20

Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study to Identify Uterine Contractions Recorded From Laboring Patients by Practicing Clinicians

Pregnancy - Labor Monitoring

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Comparison of SureCALL® and TOCO Detection of Contraction Events, as Compared to the IUPC, as Identified by Readers — 1.47; 0.85 Odds Ratio — p=0.0093

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 15+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Reproductive Research Technologies, LP
Primary completion
Jan 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Comparison of SureCALL® and TOCO Detection of Contraction Events, as Compared to the IUPC, as Identified by Readers
1.47; 0.85 0.0093 sig

Summary

This multi-reader multi-case study was designed to evaluate the performance of SureCALL® EMG Labor Monitor® (SureCALL®)to the predicate Tocodynamometer device (TOCO) using the performance of an Intrauterine Pressure Catheter device (IUPC) as the "gold standard".

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Singleton Pregnancy
  • Indicated for IUPC
  • Gestational ages from 37 to 41 weeks
  • Informed consent required

Exclusion Criteria

  • Multifetal pregnancy
  • Not Indicated for IUPC
  • Gestation age below 37 or above 41 weeks
  • Informed consent not given
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01282723). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search