Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=30 Treatment

Comparison of Surgical Time and Efficiency of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis, Knee
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01301950 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Surgical Procedure Time to Compare Skin-to-Skin Time for Conventional Versus TruMatch® Primary Total Knee Replacements — 65.8; 67.3 minutes — p=0.54

Summary

This study is designed to compare the surgical efficiency of TruMatch® Personalized Solutions surgical technique compared to conventional surgical technique. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to collect time data to enhance the existing economic model.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Surgical Procedure Time to Compare Skin-to-Skin Time for Conventional Versus TruMatch® Primary Total Knee Replacements
65.8; 67.3 0.54
SECONDARY
Operating Room Setup - Operating Room Cleaned up From Previous Case to Surgical Draping Complete
28.9; 28.8 —
SECONDARY
Turnover Time (Time to Clean Operating Room After Surgery is Completed)
10.1; 11.4 —
SECONDARY
Costs Associated With Conventional Versus TruMatch® Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Procedures
— —
SECONDARY
To Compare the Differences in Operating Room Efficiency as a Function of Institution Type and Geographical Location
— —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject is male or female and between the ages of 18 and 80 years old, inclusive.
  • Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered by the Investigator to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in the protocol.
  • Subject has given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and has authorized the transfer of his/her information to DePuy
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, is able to understand this clinical investigation, and co-operate with investigational procedures.
  • Subject, who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, are suitable for implantation using TruMatch™ instrumentation. For example, no femoral nails/bone plates that extend into the knee, ie. within 8cm of joint line; no metal device that could cause CT scatter about the knee and no deformities greater than 15 degrees of fixed varus, valgus, or flexion contracture are consistent with TruMatch™ instrumentation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
  • The Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last 3 months.
  • The Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensations claims.
  • The Subject has previously had a prosthetic knee replacement device (any type) of the affected knee.
  • The Subject requires simultaneous bilateral total knee replacements.
  • The Subject had a contralateral TKA and that knee was previously entered in the study.
  • Subject in whom the surgeon intends to implant a knee prosthesis that is not in the PFC Sigma primary knee system.
  • Subject who has inflammatory arthritis.
  • Subject who has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 40. (Please see Table 2-1: Definition of Terms, for BMI definition and calculation formulas).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01301950). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search