Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=34 Randomized Treatment

Ranibizumab Versus Low-fluence Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Enrolled (actual)
34
Serious AEs
Results posted
May 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment — 16; 2 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Verteporfin (Drug); ranibizumab (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Jang Won Heo
Primary completion
Sep 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment
16; 2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in logMAR BCVA
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness on OCT
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Choroidal Hyperpermeability on Indocyanine Green Angiography
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Underwent Rescue Treatment
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Event

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus low-fluence PDT in the treatment of chronic CSC.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 0.0 and 1.0 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR)
  • presence of subfoveal fluid persisting for 3 months or more on optical coherence tomography (OCT)
  • presence of leakage and multifocal/diffuse RPE decompensation on fluorescein angiography (FA)
  • choroidal vascular hyperpermeability and abnormal dilation of choroidal vasculature on indocyanine angiography (ICGA)

Exclusion Criteria

  • previous treatment, such as laser photocoagulation, PDT, intravitreal injection of steroid or anti-VEGF agent
  • evidence of choroidal neovascularization
  • any other ocular diseases that could affect visual acuity
  • systemic steroid treatment in the previous 12 months
  • media opacity such as cataract that could interfere with adequate acquisition of OCT, FA and ICGA images
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01325181). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search