Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=75 Randomized Treatment

Caring for the Radial Artery Post-angiogram

Transradial Angiogram

Enrolled (actual)
75
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Bleeding Requiring Intervention After Initial Hemostasis Achieved — 2; 6; 3 participants — p=0.25

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Terumo TR wristband (Device); Clo-Sur-P.A.D. (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Alberta
Primary completion
Mar 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Bleeding Requiring Intervention After Initial Hemostasis Achieved
2; 6; 3 0.25
PRIMARY
Bleeding Requiring Intervention Post-CATH Day 1
0; 1; 0 0.47
SECONDARY
Time to Discharge
178.2; 134; 113.7 0.002 sig
SECONDARY
Hematoma or Bruising at Discharge
1; 2; 0 0.372
SECONDARY
Hematoma or Bruising Post-CATH Day 1
4; 4; 7 0.468
SECONDARY
Radial Artery Occlusion Post-CATH
0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Radial Artery Occlusion Post-CATH Day 1
0; 0; 0

Summary

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare two devices and three methods for achieving hemostasis after a transradial angiogram while assessing vascular complications and time endpoints. The heart has traditionally been accessed through the femoral artery. However, in the last 20 years, the radial artery has gained more popularity among physicians and patients, thereby offering an alternative to the femoral approach. Various methods of applying compression to the radial puncture site have been used, but no research has been done to show what best practice is. In this case, best practice would be the most effective way of getting hemostasis while limiting complications and ensuring the efficient use of nursing and medical resources. It is hypothesized that statistically significant differences are seen in time to discharge in the fast-release Terumo and Clo-Sur P.A.D. groups, as compared with the control Terumo group, without increasing vascular complications.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • nonemergent
  • outpatient

Exclusion Criteria

  • inpatients
  • emergency patients
  • booked angioplasty patients
  • cognitive impairment
  • those in whom the approach was initiated but aborted due to inability to puncture the radial artery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01326455). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search