Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=192 Randomized Treatment

Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Alone or With Delayed Chemo Versus ART With Immediate Chemo for Limited AIDS-related Kaposi's Sarcoma

HIV-1 Infection · Kaposi's Sarcoma

Enrolled (actual)
192
Serious AEs
35.8%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Kaposi Sarcoma (KS) Status at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry — 43; 47; 13; 9 Participants — p=0.911

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Drug); etoposide (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Primary completion
Mar 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Kaposi Sarcoma (KS) Status at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry
43; 47; 13; 9; 24; 27 0.911
SECONDARY
KS Progressive Disease at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry
21; 7; 37; 36
SECONDARY
KS Partial Response at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry
21; 23; 37; 20
SECONDARY
KS Complete Response at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry
3; 4; 55; 39
SECONDARY
KS Partial or Complete Response at Week 48 Compared to Study Entry
24; 27; 34; 16
SECONDARY
Premature Study Discontinuation by Week 48
13; 11; 67; 72
SECONDARY
Kaposi Sarcoma (KS) Status at Week 96 Compared to Study Entry
33; 33; 4; 0; 21; 28
SECONDARY
KS Progressive Disease at Week 96 Compared to Study Entry
10; 2; 25; 28
SECONDARY
KS Partial Response at Week 96 Compared to Study Entry
19; 24; 16; 6
SECONDARY
KS Complete Response at Week 96 Compared to Study Entry
2; 4; 33; 26
SECONDARY
KS Partial or Complete Response at Week 96 Compared to Study Entry
21; 28; 14; 2
SECONDARY
Premature Study Discontinuation by Week 96
14; 10; 44; 51
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Progressive Disease by Week 96
60.61; 52.73
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Partial or Complete Response by Week 96
39.89; 64.08
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Partial Response by Week 96
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of Initial KS Complete Response by Week 96
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
47; 42
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of KS-IRIS
23.14; 7.40
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Etoposide Dose Modification
0; 5.2; 15.6; 9.4; 37.5; 24.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Suppression
4.3; 4.2; 90.3; 90.6; 94.5; 97.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With ARV Dose Modification
7.4; 11.5; 26.6; 21.9; 1.1; 0
SECONDARY
Change in log10 HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load From Entry
SECONDARY
Change in Peripheral Blood CD4+ Lymphocyte Cell Count
40; 67; 57; 121; 90; 119
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of KS Progressive Disease After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A
35.78
SECONDARY
Cumulative Incidence of KS Response After Initiation of Delayed Etoposide in Arm A
62.57

Summary

AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) occurs in persons with HIV infection who are also infected with the Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV). Several chemotherapy (anti-cancer) drugs work well in treating KS, but there is no treatment that cures KSHV infection. One chemotherapy drug called etoposide (VePesid®, ET) has caused KS tumors to get smaller in some people. Antiretroviral therapy (anti-HIV drugs or ART) is a group of medicines taken together to treat HIV infection. These medicines help to stop HIV from growing in the body. When this happens, the immune system, which fights infection and some cancers like KS, gets stronger. For some people, limited stage KS often improves or stays the same when they take ART. However, in some people KS continues to get worse when taking ART. These people may need chemotherapy at a later date. This study was done to find out if taking ART with immediate etoposide (ET) is better than taking ART alone or ART with delayed ET to treat limited stage KS. The study also tried to better understand KSHV and to see what kind of side effects are caused by ART and ET and how safe ART and ET are.

Eligibility Criteria

Step 1: Inclusion Criteria

  • HIV-1 infection.
  • Biopsy diagnostic of KS at any time prior to study entry.
  • Limited stage KS defined as stage T0 and some presentations of stage T1. Stage T0 was confined to skin and/or lymph nodes and/or minimal oral disease defined as non-nodular KS confined to the palate. The following presentations of stage T1 KS were also eligible at the discretion of the site investigator:
  • Tumor-associated edema limited to the area(s) of KS without significant functional impairment.
  • Oral KS that consists of flat (non-nodular and non-ulcerating) lesions confined to the soft palate, hard palate, gums, and buccal mucosa.
  • Asymptomatic gastrointestinal KS (i.e., no unexplained abdominal pain or gastrointestinal bleeding).
  • A minimum of 5 cutaneous marker lesions
  • Certain laboratory values obtained within 14 days prior to study entry.
  • For female participants of reproductive potential, a negative serum or urine pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to study entry.
  • All participants must have agreed not to participate in a conception process (e.g., active attempt to become pregnant or to impregnate, donate sperm, in vitro fertilization).
  • Participants who are participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy must have agreed to use a combination of TWO of the following methods- Condoms (male or female) with or without a spermicidal agent, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, IUD, tubal ligation, and/or hormone-based contraception. For Etoposide, confirmation of lack of reproductive potential was required for all participants. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.
  • Ability to swallow oral medications.
  • Karnofsky performance score >= 60 within 30 days prior to entry.
  • Ability and willingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to provide informed consent.
  • Peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocyte cell count obtained within 30 days prior to study entry at a DAIDS-approved laboratory.
  • For treatment-experienced patients, the availability of an ART regimen that includes at least two ART drugs that in the opinion of the site investigator are expected to have activity based on historical genotypic testing (if available) and treatment history.
  • For participants who were to receive ART other than EFV/TDF/FTC, the availability of those ART components.

Step 2: Inclusion Criteria

  • KS progression compared to study entry or best response with ART alone while on Step 1, between weeks 8 and 80.
  • Need for ET for treatment of KS progression, in the opinion of the site investigator, after confirmation of KS progression by the IERC.
  • Willingness to receive ET for treatment of KS progression.
  • For female participants of reproductive potential, a negative serum or urine pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to initiating ET.
  • Karnofsky Performance Score >= 50.
  • Certain laboratory values obtained within 14 days prior to Step 2 entry.
  • Ability to swallow oral medications.
  • All participants must have agreed not to participate in a conception process (e.g., active attempt to become pregnant or to impregnate, donate sperm, in vitro fertilization).
  • Participants who are participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy must have agreed to use a combination of TWO of the following methods- Condoms (male or female) with or without a spermicidal agent, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, IUD, tubal ligation, hormone-based contraception. For Etoposide, confirmation of lack of reproductive potential was required for all participants. More information on this criterion can be found in the study protocol.

Step 3: Inclusion Criteria

  • Received at least one dose of ET (Arm B participants and Arm A participants who entered Step 2)

Step 1: Exclusion Criteria

  • Any manifestation of KS which, in the opinion of the site investigator, requires immediate chemotherapy.
  • More than 14 days of ART after onset
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01352117). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search