Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=371 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

16 Week Efficacy and 2 Year Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01358175 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
371
Serious AEs
10.6%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society / ASAS 20 Response — 59.7; 60.8; 28.7 % responders — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Established
22citations · ~4 / year
Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1.
BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who are intolerant to or have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs, DMARDs and / or TNFα inhibitor therapy.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1.
    BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021 · 22 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • A Pooled Analysis Reporting the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.
    Rheumatology and therapy · 2021 · 19 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Secukinumab Efficacy on Enthesitis in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Four Pivotal Phase III Studies.
    The Journal of rheumatology · 2021 · 17 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Achievement of Remission Endpoints with Secukinumab Over 3 Years in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies.
    Rheumatology and therapy · 2021 · 15 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Automated detection of spinal bone marrow oedema in axial spondyloarthritis: training and validation using two large phase 3 trial datasets.
    Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025 · 3 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society / ASAS 20 Response
59.7; 60.8; 28.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 40 Response
33.1; 41.6; 13.1
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Serum hsCRP
0.45; 0.4; 0.97
SECONDARY
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 5/6 Response
45.2; 48.8; 13.1
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index / BASDAI
-2.34; -2.32; -0.59
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey / SF-36 PCS
5.64; 5.57; 0.96
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire / ASQoL
-3.61; -3.58; -1.04
SECONDARY
Assessment of Responders for ASAS Partial Remission
16.1; 15.2; 3.3

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe AS with prior documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984)
  • Patients should have been on NSAIDs with an inadequate response
  • Patients who are regularly taking NSAIDs as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose
  • Patients who have been on an anti-TNFα agent (not more than one) must have experienced an inadequate response

Exclusion criteria

  • Chest X-ray with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process
  • Patients with total ankylosis of the spine
  • Patients previously treated with any biological immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01358175) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search