Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=59 Randomized Treatment

Trial to Assess the Impact of PrEP to Tenofovir Gel on the Efficacy of Tenofovir-containing ART on Viral Suppression

Antiretroviral Treatment Outcomes

Enrolled (actual)
59
Serious AEs
35.6%
Results posted
Mar 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: The Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Rate at 12 Months. — 4; 5 participants — p=1.00

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa
Primary completion
Nov 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Rate at 12 Months.
4; 5 1.00
SECONDARY
Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Randomisation to 12 Months Post-randomisation
217; 174 0.481
SECONDARY
Tenofovir Resistance, Defined as Presence of K65R, K70E or Any of the TAMS Mutations
1; 1
SECONDARY
Reported Adverse Events With Severity Grades 3 and 4 Based on the DAIDS Toxicity Grading Tables
7; 12 0.267
SECONDARY
Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses
SECONDARY
Genital Viral Shedding (Viral Load on Tear Flow)

Summary

The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains among the investigators greatest public health challenges. In the absence of an effective vaccine, focus has shifted to other prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis. Tenofovir, with potent activity against retroviruses [1], was developed for oral use as Viread®, which is widely used for HIV treatment. The efficacy of Viread® has been demonstrated in treatment-experienced and naïve patients [2,3]. In antiretroviral-naive patients, the combination of tenofovir with lamivudine and efavirenz has been classified as a preferred regimen in the Department of Health and Human Services treatment guidelines[4], and has been adopted by the South African Department of health as the first line regimen in treatment-naïve HIV infected patients since April 2010. The durability of antiviral response, favourable resistance profile, once daily dosing, and excellent long term safety profile of tenofovir [5], makes this drug an attractive option in both treatment and prevention regimens and its long half-life [6], made it an ideal choice as the first antiretroviral drug to be formulated as a microbicide gel. The CAPRISA 004 study conducted in South Africa which tested the effectiveness and safety of 1% tenofovir gel showed that the use of tenofovir in a gel formulation reduced HIV acquisition by 39% overall, and by 54% in women with high gel adherence [7]. There have been concerns raised regarding the use of tenofovir in both PrEP and treatment regimens due to the potential for selection of viral mutations and development of resistance in patients who have become HIV-infected while on PrEP. There have been no studies conducted to determine whether using tenofovir in pre-exposure prophylaxis affects treatment outcomes in patients who later use tenofovir, which is part of the first line ART of South Africa. This study aims to determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Previously enrolled in the CAPRISA 004 or CAPRISA 008 study - placebo or active arms
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent to be screened for, and to enrol in, the study
  • Able and willing to provide adequate locator information for study retention purposes
  • Confirmed HIV infection in the CAPRISA 004 or 008 trial
  • Agree to adhere to study visits and procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Currently on antiretroviral therapy (including PMTCT prophylaxis)
  • Has any other condition that, based on the opinion of the Investigator or designee, would preclude provision of informed consent, make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01387022). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search