Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=120 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Treating Acutely Agitated Patients With Asenapine Sublingual Tablets

Agitation
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01400113 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
120
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - Excited Component — 7.86; 14.93 PANSS SCORE
◆ Published Evidence
Established
80citations · ~7 / year
A single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sublingual asenapine for acute agitation.
Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2014 · Likely link

Summary

Our proposal is to administer asenapine to patients who are clinically agitated and in need of immediate intervention. At present there are no controlled studies that we know of that explores the use of asenapine for this purpose. Establishing the utility of asenapine for this common clinical problem will support its use as an additional treatment option in acutely agitated patients.

Linked Publications

  • A single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sublingual asenapine for acute agitation.
    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2014 · 80 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - Excited Component
7.86; 14.93
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impression Scale

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients will be between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Be acutely agitated as determined by a total score of ≧ 14 on the PANSS-EC and at least one individual item score of ≧ 4
  • Patients must have the capacity to provide informed consent, and such consent will be obtained prior to participation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is knowingly pregnant
  • Patient is less than 18 or greater than 65 years old
  • Patient had a past adverse or allergic response to Asenapine
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01400113) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search