Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=135 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Propofol vs. Midazolam-based Balanced Propofol for Nonanesthesiologist Moderate Sedation in Colonoscopy

Procedural Sedation
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01428882 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
135
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Level of Sedation Throughout the Entire Procedure — 22; 9; 10; 1 participants
◆ Published Evidence
Established
42citations · ~3 / year
Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol versus midazolam and propofol, titrated to moderate sedation, for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Digestive diseases and sciences · 2012 · Likely link

Summary

Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for sedation is actually a field of growing interest for endoscopists, as demonstrated by recent American and European guidelines on this issue. Propofol is a hypnotic drug with rapid onset and offset of action. Used as a single agent, it is commonly titrated to deep sedation, whereas balanced propofol sedation (BPS), which combines propofol with small doses of a benzodiazepine and/or an opioid, can be successfully titrated to moderate sedation. However, nonanesthesiologists propofol administration remains controversial on account of the possibility of deep sedation/general anesthesia related adverse events. On the other hand, the use of longer elimination half-life drugs, such as opioids and benzodiazepines, may theoretically prolong sedation and recovery. Up to date, no study has addressed a head-to-head comparison of both regimens administered by non-anesthesiologists and titrated to moderate sedation. This study aims to evaluate the impact on propofol sedation of premedication with a fixed dose of midazolam (2 mg)2 minutes before propofol administration targeted to moderate sedation, in terms of depth of sedation, recovery times, safety and satisfaction. The onset of sedative action of midazolam has been reported to be 1-2.5 minutes and the peak effect of midazolam occurs 8-12 minutes. Taking into account that colonoscopy usually lasts a minimum of 15-20 minutes, our hypothesis is that synergy between propofol and midazolam may increase the depth of sedation through the initial phases of the procedure, diminishing propofol requirements, but not prolonging significantly recovery times.

Linked Publications

  • Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol versus midazolam and propofol, titrated to moderate sedation, for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Digestive diseases and sciences · 2012 · 42 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Level of Sedation Throughout the Entire Procedure
22; 9; 10; 1; 12; 2
SECONDARY
Duration of Recovery After the Endoscopic Procedure
6.8; 5.3; 10.4; 9.80
SECONDARY
Rate of Sedation-related Complications During the Procedure and the Recovery Phases
5; 5; 2; 1; 3; 2
SECONDARY
Rate of Patients and Physician Satisfaction With Sedation
8.9; 8.4; 9.8; 9.5

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Allergy to propofol, soybeans, eggs or midazolam
  • Chronic intake of benzodiazepines
  • History of colorectal surgery
  • ASA class IV, short and tick neck, difficult intubation due to inability to open the mouth widely
  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal, inability or unwillingness to give written consent
  • Patients scheduled for advanced therapeutic colonoscopy or for more than one endoscopic procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01428882) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search