Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=447 Randomized Treatment

Treatment of Neonatal Jaundice With Filtered Sunlight Phototherapy: Safety and Efficacy in African Neonates

Jaundice, Neonatal

Enrolled (actual)
447
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Safety of Phototherapy — 268; 325 treatment days

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Filtered-sunlight phototherapy (Device); Conventional phototherapy (Device)
Age
Pediatric
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Primary completion
Sep 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Safety of Phototherapy
268; 325
PRIMARY
Efficacy of Phototherapy
232; 280
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Requiring Exchange Blood Transfusion
0; 0

Summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of filtered sunlight phototherapy. Sunlight will be filtered by flexible (window-tinting) film. The subject population will be neonates born at Island Maternity Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. The rationale for conducting the study is that in Nigeria, and other countries that may not have effective commercial light devices or have reliable access to electric power to operate them, filtered sunlight phototherapy might offer a safe and effective treatment for neonatal jaundice. Phase I of the study focused on the safety and efficacy of filtered sunlight phototherapy. Phase II of the study was a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial comparing the efficacy of filtered sunlight phototherapy with conventional phototherapy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects will be eligible to participate in the study if all of the following conditions exist:

  • At time of birth, infant is > 35 weeks gestation (or > 2.2 kg if gestational age is not available
  • Infant is 38 degrees Centigrade
  • Infants with ABE on clinical exam
  • Infants meeting the criteria for EBT
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01434810). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search