Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,147 Randomized Prevention

The Skin Prep Study

Surgical Site Infections

Enrolled (actual)
1,147
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Surgical Site Infection — 23; 42 Participants — p=0.02

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Iodine-alcohol (Drug); Chlorhexidine-alcohol (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Primary completion
Jun 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Surgical Site Infection
23; 42 0.02 sig
SECONDARY
Length of Hospital Stay
4; 4 0.24
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Re-admissions or Office Visits for Wound-related Problems
19; 25 0.37
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Endometritis
8; 11 0.49
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Skin Irritation
0; 3 0.08
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Allergic Reaction
2; 1 0.56
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Skin Contamination After Skin Prep
SECONDARY
Cost Savings

Summary

The investigators propose a randomized controlled clinical trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine-alcohol preoperative skin preparation for preventing surgical site infections at cesarean section. While estimates vary, surgical site infections complicate up to 5 - 10% of all cesarean sections and result in significant human suffering and excess health care costs. Interventions such as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis reduce surgical site infections by 60%, but the rate of infection remains high. There is therefore a great need to identify and test other potential interventions to further reduce these infections. The skin is a major source of pathogens that cause surgical site infection. Therefore, optimizing preoperative skin antisepsis has the potential to decrease postoperative surgical site infections. There is paucity of evidence to guide the choice of antiseptic for skin preparation at cesarean section. To date, only two underpowered trials have been published comparing two methods of preoperative skin preparation at cesarean section. A recent randomized trial in adults undergoing clean-contaminated mostly general surgical procedures demonstrated a 41% reduction in surgical site infection with the use of chlorhexidine-alcohol when compared to the more commonly used povidone-iodine. While it is plausible that findings from trials in other clean-contaminated surgical procedures may apply to cesarean sections, physiological changes in pregnancy, the peculiar dual microbial source for cesarean-related infections and the hormone-mediated immune-modulation in pregnancy make the validity of such extrapolation uncertain. The study has the following specific aims: Primary Aim: To test the hypothesis that preoperative chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation at cesarean section significantly reduces surgical site infections compared to iodine-alcohol. Secondary Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that preoperative chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation at cesarean section significantly reduces bacterial contamination at the surgical site compared to iodine-alcohol. Secondary Aim 2: To determine clinical outcomes and medical costs associated with cesarean-related infections and quantify potential cost savings attributable to use of chlorhexidine-alcohol for preoperative skin preparation at cesarean section.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women undergoing cesarean delivery at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to obtain consent; allergy to chlorhexidine, alcohol, iodine, shellfish; and evidence of infection adjacent to operative site.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01472549). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search