Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=255 Randomized Double-blind

Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Arteriography

Drug Safety

Enrolled (actual)
255
Serious AEs
1.6%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Subjects Experiencing Discomfort When Undergoing Peripheral Arteriography — 53; 92; 48; 82 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Iodixanol (Drug); Iopamidol (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GE Healthcare
Primary completion
Feb 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subjects Experiencing Discomfort When Undergoing Peripheral Arteriography
53; 92; 48; 82; 5; 21
SECONDARY
Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Arteriography.
109; 103; 16; 19; 1; 3

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between an Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing arteriography of peripheral arteries.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject is over 18 years old.
  • Subjects are referred to undergo a peripheral arteriography as part of their routine clinical care.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The subject has known allergies to iodine or any prior history of adverse reaction to iodinated CM.
  • The subject received another administration of CM within 24 hours prior to baseline or is scheduled to receive one within the 24 hour follow-up period.
  • The subject is pregnant or lactating.
  • The subject is taking metformin (e.g., Glucophage®) but is not willing or unable to discontinue at the time of the study procedure.
  • The subject manifests thyrotoxicosis or is on dialysis.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01475097). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search