Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=304 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Chinese Subjects With Wet AMD (Age-Related Macular Degeneration)

Macular Degeneration

Enrolled (actual)
304
Serious AEs
4.2%
Results posted
Mar 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score at Week 28 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) — 14.0; 3.9 Letters correctly read — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Aflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) (Biological); Visudyne (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bayer
Primary completion
Mar 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score at Week 28 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
14.0; 3.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Lost Fewer Than 15 Letters at Week 28 - LOCF
98.7; 92.1 0.0359 sig

Summary

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreally (IVT), i.e. directly into the eye administered VEGF Trap-Eye compared with photodynamic therapy (PDT) on visual function in Chinese subjects with age-related neovascular or "wet" age-related macular degeneration. Subjects will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to either receive VEGF Trap-Eye or PDT. Both treatment groups will receive the other treatment as a sham procedure.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed and dated informed consent form
  • Men and women ≥ 50 years of age.
  • Active predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions secondary to wAMD (wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration)
  • BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) of 20/40 to 20/320 in the study eye

Exclusion Criteria

  • Only one functional eye
  • Presence of CNV with an origin other than wAMD
  • Any prior ocular or systemic treatment or surgery for wAMD, except dietary supplements or vitamins
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01482910). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search