Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=34 Diagnostic

Accuracy Study of a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Cuff in Comparison to an Invasive Radial Arterial Blood Pressure

Blood Pressure

Enrolled (actual)
34
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using SuperStat Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading — -0.94; 1.39 mmHg

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
BP monitoring using two methods (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GE Healthcare
Primary completion
Dec 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using SuperStat Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading
-0.94; 1.39
PRIMARY
Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using Classic Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading
0.68; 0.42

Summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the performance of a blood pressure cuff. The hypothesis is that the blood pressure reading from the cuff will provide similar blood pressure as a radial artery.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ability to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide written informed consent
  • Any volunteer subjects ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject must have the presence of normal sinus rhythm on ECG
  • Subject will return for follow-up visit from 5 days to 8 days after study procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any subject who is unable to provide written informed consent
  • Any subject with the presence of peripheral vascular disease in either arm
  • Any subject that demonstrates an initial NIBP screening for a blood pressure distribution range that has already been filled.
  • Any subject who cannot tolerate 21 repeated BP measurements
  • Any subjects with clotting or bleeding disorders
  • Any subjects taking medications that are considered anticoagulants or blood thinners (For example, Clopidogrel, Warfarin, Dipyridamole, Aspirin, and Enoxaparin)
  • Any subject who is unable to have arterial line placed in the radial artery
  • Any subject that cannot tolerate 4 fast flushes for the frequency response
  • Any female subjects pregnant or lactating
  • Any subject that has previously participated in this study
  • Any subjects that cannot return 5 to 8 days post study procedure for a follow-up visit
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01485120). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search