Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=65 Randomized Single-blind Diagnostic

Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old

Endotracheal Intubation

Enrolled (actual)
65
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Measurement of Time to Intubation Will Begin at the Time of Mouth Opening and End With the Removal of the Tip of the Laryngoscope Blade From the Patient's Mouth After Successful Endotracheal Intubation. — 30.8; 42.1; 21.5 Seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Endotracheal intubation (Device)
Age
Pediatric
Sex
All
Sponsor
Loma Linda University
Primary completion
Jul 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Measurement of Time to Intubation Will Begin at the Time of Mouth Opening and End With the Removal of the Tip of the Laryngoscope Blade From the Patient's Mouth After Successful Endotracheal Intubation.
30.8; 42.1; 21.5
SECONDARY
Successful Intubation After One Laryngoscopy Attempt
17; 16; 16
SECONDARY
Successful Intubation After Two Laryngoscopy Attempts
3; 5; 2
SECONDARY
Successful Intubation After Three Laryngoscopy Attempts
1; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Successful Intubation After Four Laryngoscopy Attempts
1; 0; 0

Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation will be compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, those intubated with a Storz DCI® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the Storz DCI® video laryngoscope group when compared to the GlideScope® video laryngoscope group and standard laryngoscopy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pediatric patients under the age of 2 years undergoing surgeries requiring endotracheal intubation at LLUMC will be eligible for participation in this study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Children with increased pulmonary aspiration risk;
  • Prior documentation of difficult endotracheal intubation;
  • Those that lack legal representative consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01488370). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search