Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=218 Randomized Quadruple-blind Supportive Care

Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of EP2006 and Filgrastim

Chemotherapy Associated Neutropenia · Breast Cancer
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01519700 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
218
Serious AEs
6.5%
Results posted
Apr 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Duration of Grade 4 Neutropenia During Cycle 1 of Chemotherapy — 1.17; 1.2 Days

Summary

The study will assess the efficacy of EP2006 compared to Filgrastim with respect to the mean duration of severe neutropenia during treatment with myelosuppressive chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Duration of Grade 4 Neutropenia During Cycle 1 of Chemotherapy
1.17; 1.2
SECONDARY
Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia
50; 49; 54; 51; 204; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Days of Fever
39; 41; 42; 46; 168; 1
SECONDARY
Depth of Absolute Neutrophil Count Nadir
0.808; 0.744; 0.776
SECONDARY
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Recovery
2.0; 2.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Frequency of Infections
102; 104; 206; 1; 3; 4
SECONDARY
Incidence of Hospitalizations Due to Febrile Neutropenia
50; 50; 55; 51; 206; 2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with histologically proven breast cancer, eligible for neoadjuvant or adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy
  • Women ≥ 18 years of age
  • Estimated life expectancy of more than six months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous or concurrent malignancy except non-invasive non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or other solid tumor treated curatively, and without evidence of recurrence for at least ten years prior to study entry
  • Any serious illness or medical condition that may interfere with safety, compliance, response to the products under investigation and their evaluation, e.g.:

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01519700). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search