Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=64 Randomized Treatment

Tissue Glue (Cyanoacrylate) Versus Conventional Suture in Kidney Donors

Skin Closure of Surgical Incisions by Tissue Glue vs Suture

Enrolled (actual)
64
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Rubor Postoperative Day 2. — 0.516; 0.984 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Skin wound closure by tissue glue (Procedure); Skin wound closure by conventional suture + dressing (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Primary completion
Nov 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Rubor Postoperative Day 2.
0.516; 0.984
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Rubor Postoperative Day 4.
0.547; 0.750
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Rubor at Discharge From Hospital.
0.476; 0.639
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Secretion Postoperative Day 2.
0.328; 0.594
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Secretion Postoperative Day 4.
0.375; 0.117
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Secretion at Discharge From Hospital.
0.286; 0.028
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Oedema Postoperative Day 2.
0; 0.094
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Oedema Postoperative Day 4.
0; 0.083
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Oedema at Discharge From Hospital.
0; 0.111
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Blisters Postoperative Day 2.
0; 0.156
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Blisters Postoperative Day 4.
0; 0.200
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Blisters at Discharge From Hospital.
0; 0.028
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Gaps Postoperative Day 2.
0.094; 0
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Gaps Postoperative Day 4.
0.344; 0
PRIMARY
Wound Healing by Numerical Scales for Gaps at Discharge From Hospital.
0.400; 0
PRIMARY
TIme Consumption
5.832; 8.594
PRIMARY
Patients´Self Satisfaction.
4.968; 4.875

Summary

By means of a prospective, randomised trial the investigators want to examine skin closure in living donors - subjected to laparoscopic, hand-assisted nephrectomy - by tissue glue (Cyanoacrylate (Liquiband)) versus conventional, intracutaneous suture and dressing (1 : 1; 30 + 30 donors). Study hypothesis: (i) Latest generation tissue glue (Cyanoacrylate (Liquiband)) is at least as good as conventional suture regarding wound healing/complications. (ii) Peroperatively, tissue glue is faster than conventional suture.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Living kidney donor with informed consent
  • Approved comprehensive work-up/evaluation at local hospital

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy towards acrylate or similar chemicals
  • Unable to communicate in norwegian language
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01521871). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search