Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=1,274 Randomized Treatment

Safety and Efficacy Study of IPG Patient With Home Monitoring

Bradyarrhythmia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01523704 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,274
Serious AEs
12.3%
Results posted
Jan 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Evaluation for Equivalence of the Number of Patients Who Meet the Composite Safety Endpoint Between Home Monitoring Group(HM) and Control Group Which is HM + Conventional In-office Follow-up — 61; 65 Participants

Summary

The number of patients with implantable pulse generator (IPG) has steadily increased in Japan causing increment in number of in office follow-ups and greater burden on many hospitals. The purpose of this multicenter randomized study is to demonstrate that BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring system reduces office follow-up visits without compromising patient safety.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Evaluation for Equivalence of the Number of Patients Who Meet the Composite Safety Endpoint Between Home Monitoring Group(HM) and Control Group Which is HM + Conventional In-office Follow-up
61; 65
SECONDARY
The Median (IQR) Numbers of In-office Follow-up(FU) Visits Per Patient-year
0.69; 2.00
SECONDARY
Efficacy of Home Monitoring:Average Cost for In-office Follow-up Per Patient-year
21065; 23552

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Indicated for IPG implantation under Japanese guidelines
  • Implanted within the last 45 days or being considered for implant with a BIOTRONIK IPG with Home Monitoring
  • Able to utilize HM system throughout the study
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Geographically stable and able to return for follow-ups for 27 months
  • Over 20 years old
  • Patient able to understand and follow the procedure stated in protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindicated for IPG under Japanese guidelines
  • Patients who are currently included in another cardiac clinical study
  • Patients with expected life period of less than two years
  • Patients who might undergo heart transplantation in next two years.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01523704). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search