Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=125 Randomized Supportive Care

Quality of Life Intermittent Catheter Study

Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction Nos

Enrolled (actual)
125
Serious AEs
2.1%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Quality of Life (0-100 Point) — 76.8; 59.8 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
SpeediCath Compact (Device); Standard care (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Coloplast A/S
Primary completion
Apr 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Quality of Life (0-100 Point)
76.8; 59.8

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare compact intermittent catheters with standard coated intermittent catheters with regard to quality of life, using the Intermittent Self-Catheterisation Quality of life Measure.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Is at least 18 years of age
  • Has given written informed consent
  • Has neurogenic bladder dysfunction
  • Has used coated intermittent catheter as primarily bladder emptying method for at least 6 months
  • Is able to self-catheterise
  • Is able to use SpeediCath® compact catheters
  • If spinal cord injury subject, injury must have occurred more than 12 months ago
  • Covered by Social security system

Exclusion Criteria

  • Has used SpeediCath® compact catheters (not including screening for this investigation)
  • Is admitted to rehabilitation centre
  • Subjects using primarily catheter sets
  • Is pregnant or breast-feeding
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01523743). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search