Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=220 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Idelalisib in Combination With Rituximab for Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Enrolled (actual)
220
Serious AEs
49.5%
Results posted
Oct 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Progression-Free Survival — NA; 5.5 months — p=< 0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Idelalisib (Drug); Rituximab (Drug); Placebo to match idelalisib (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Gilead Sciences
Primary completion
Oct 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Progression-Free Survival
NA; 5.5 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Overall Response Rate
74.5; 14.5
SECONDARY
Lymph Node Response Rate
92.2; 5.9
SECONDARY
Overall Survival
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Complete Response Rate
0; 0

Summary

This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the effect of idelalisib in combination with rituximab on the onset, magnitude, and duration of tumor control in participants previously treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Eligible patients will be randomized with a 1:1 ratio into 1 of the 2 treatment arms to receive either idelalisib plus rituximab or placebo plus rituximab. Participants who are tolerating primary study therapy but experience definitive CLL progression are eligible to receive active idelalisib therapy in the extension study, GS-US-312-0117.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion:

  • Adult subjects with previously treated recurrent CLL who have measurable lymphadenopathy
  • Require therapy for CLL
  • Have experienced CLL progression < 24 months since the completion of the last prior therapy
  • Currently not sufficiently fit to receive cytotoxic therapy because of chemotherapy-induced bone marrow damage or comorbidities.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01539512). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search