Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Treatment

Pan Facial Volume Restoration

Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Hyaluronic acid dermal filler gel (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Galderma R&D
Primary completion
Mar 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment
-0.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 3 Weeks After Last Injection
32.2; 67.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Investigators Satisfied With the Use of Study Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler
100
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied at 18 Months After Last Injection
25; 70

Summary

The aim of this study is to assess performance and tolerance as well as investigator and subject satisfaction further to pan-facial volume restoration with a new cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler containing lidocaine 0.3%.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects seeking treatment for correction of volume loss.
  • Subjects presenting a score of at least 2 (visible depression or descent) for whole face on the volume loss scale and at least 2 indications affected by volume loss among the following: chin temporal areas, jawlines, cheeks, cheekbones, deep to very deep nasolabial folds (severity score 4 at least on Lemperle rating scale) if cheekbones are injected.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects at risk in term of precautions, warnings and contraindication referred in the package insert of the study device,
  • Subjects who underwent previous injection of permanent filler in the injected area.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01545557). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search