Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=146 Diagnostic

Comparison Evaluation of Blood Glucose Meter Systems

Diabetes

Enrolled (actual)
146
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: MARD (Mean Absolute Relative Difference Between BGMS Results and Reference Method Results) Across the Overall Tested Glucose Range — 4.7; 6.3; 18.3; 23.4 percentage

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
CONTOUR® NEXT EZ BGMS (Device); FreeStyle Freedom Lite® BGMS (Device); ACCU-CHEK® Aviva BGMS (Device); TRUEtrack® BGMS (Device); OneTouch® Ultra®2 BGMS (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Ascensia Diabetes Care
Primary completion
Mar 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
MARD (Mean Absolute Relative Difference Between BGMS Results and Reference Method Results) Across the Overall Tested Glucose Range
4.7; 6.3; 18.3; 23.4; 26.2
SECONDARY
MARD (Mean Absolute Relative Difference Between BGMS Results and Reference Method Results) Across the Low Glucose Range (<70mg/dL)
0.7; 2.5; 18.3; 22.4; 33.2

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of one investigational Bayer Blood Glucose meter (with investigational Bayer test strips) and four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems from other companies. All meter BG results were compared with plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method (YSI Glucose Analyzer). Performance of the five systems was evaluated across the glucose range of the BGMSs using capillary blood. All testing and lancing were performed by study staff and some blood samples were glycolyzed to lower the glucose levels.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and females
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Willing to complete all study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Blood Borne infections like hepatitis or HIV or infections such as tuberculosis
  • Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
  • Pregnancy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01548885). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search