Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30 Randomized Supportive Care

Anesthesia During Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Scoliosis Patients

Idiopathic Scoliosis

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Amplitude Required to Elicit the MEP — 307; 417 milliamperes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
propofol (Drug); Desflurane (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Primary completion
Apr 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Amplitude Required to Elicit the MEP
307; 417
SECONDARY
Amplitude of the SSEPs
0.83; 0.84
SECONDARY
Latency of the SSEP's
27.6; 28.2

Summary

When patients have spinal surgery, electrodes are placed on the body to measure motor evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). Many hospitals only use IV anesthesia because they feel that measuring MEP and SSEP is easier using IV anesthesia. At this hospital the investigators typically use inhaled anesthesia and are able to successfully measure MEP and SSEP. This is a study to find out if one method of anesthesia is better than the other for measuring MEP and SSEP.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01549873). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search