Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=149 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

Hub Cleansing to Prevent Hub Infection

Bacteremia

Enrolled (actual)
149
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Central Venous Catheter Hubs With Internal Contamination — 42; 18; 39; 14 contaminated hubs

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
15 second scrub (Other); 5 second scrub (Other); 3.15% chlorhexidine/70% isopropyl alcohol (Drug); 70% isopropyl alcohol (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Primary completion
Jun 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Central Venous Catheter Hubs With Internal Contamination
42; 18; 39; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Contaminated Central Venous Catheter Tips
SECONDARY
Median Number of Microbial Colony Forming Units Per Hub Interior
0; 0; 0; 0

Summary

Central venous catheter infections are common preventable adverse events among hospital patients. Microbes may enter catheter hubs, also known as needleless connectors, and result in downstream contamination. This study aims to compare alcohol disinfection of catheter hubs to disinfection with chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol, which has been proven to be a superior disinfectant at the site of central venous catheter insertion. Scrub duration of central venous catheter hubs will also be evaluated.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Medical intensive care unit patients with non-tunneled central venous catheters

Exclusion Criteria

  • Dialysis catheters
  • Antibiotic-impregnated catheters
  • Introducer sheaths
  • Tunneled catheters
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01563406). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search