N/A
N=40
Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01588444 ↗Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- cortical FDBA (Device); Cancellous FDBA (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 19+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation |
12.98; 16.08 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare cortical and cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) materials in the preservation of alveolar bone following extraction of non-molar teeth. The primary objective is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of extraction sockets of non-molar teeth grafted with cortical FDBA versus cancellous FDBA for ridge preservation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- single rooted tooth requiring extraction with future dental implant placement
Exclusion Criteria
- smoking > 10 cigarettes per day poorly controlled diabetes
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01588444). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.