Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=197 Randomized Double-blind Other

Radioprotective Light-weight Caps in the Interventional Cardiology Setting

Occupational Exposure to Radiation
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01620658 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
197
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Radiation Attenuation in Percentage (%) — 12; 91.5; 97.1 Percentage

Summary

The primary objective of the present trial is to compare the radiation attenuation provided by XPF caps (0.5mm lead-equivalent and 0.3mm lead-equivalent) to the standard protection (fabric cap, basically no protection) as measured in % radiation attenuation) during 150 days of fluoroscopy guided cardiology interventions. The second objective is to compare the operator comfort (rated on a visual analog scale) of wearing the XPF protection caps compared to the standard fabric caps.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Radiation Attenuation in Percentage (%)
12; 91.5; 97.1
PRIMARY
Absolute Radiation Exposure Outside of Cap
132; 118; 59
SECONDARY
Operator Comfort Assessment
90; 90; 90
SECONDARY
Operator Comfort Assessment Based on Weight
12.5; 123.7; 118.4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Interventional Cardiologist practicing in Baptist Cardiac & Vascular Institute
  • cardiac procedure requiring C-arm fluoroscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Interventional Neuroradiologists and Interventional Radiologists will not be included in this study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01620658). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search