Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=1,408 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Phase III Cat-PAD Study

Rhinoconjunctivitis

Enrolled (actual)
1,408
Serious AEs
2.4%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo — 1.04; 1.00; 1.05 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Cat-PAD (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 12+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Circassia Limited
Primary completion
Jun 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo
1.04; 1.00; 1.05
SECONDARY
Mean TRSS
5.67; 5.54; 5.87
SECONDARY
Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
3.48; 3.36; 3.44
SECONDARY
Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo
2.20; 2.19; 2.42
SECONDARY
Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
0.34; 0.31; 0.32
SECONDARY
Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
1.26; 1.26; 1.25
SECONDARY
Number of Days With no Moderate or Severe TRSS Symptoms Without Rescue Medication Use
9.44; 10.11; 9.76

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment effect of two treatment regimens of Cat-PAD vs placebo and to evaluates the treatment effect of Cat-PAD on symptoms, rescue medication usage and Quality of Life.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female, aged 12-65 years.
  • Moderate to severe rhinoconjunctivitis on exposure to cats for at least 2 years.
  • Subjects may optionally also have GINA Step 1 controlled asthma.
  • Positive skin prick test to cat hair.
  • Cat dander specific IgE ≥0.35 kU/L.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Asthma falling under the GINA definitions "partly controlled" and "uncontrolled" or Steps 2 to 5.
  • FEV1 <80% of predicted.
  • Clinically significant confounding symptoms of allergy to seasonal allergens during the final evaluation period.
  • Skin prick test 5 mm greater than the negative control to perennial allergens or animal dander (other than cat) which cannot be avoided during the study.
  • Significant symptoms of another clinically relevant illness that is likely to affect scoring of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
  • Clinically relevant abnormalities detected on physical examination.
  • History of severe drug allergy, severe angioedema or anaphylactic reaction to food.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01620762). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search