Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,100 Randomized Double-blind Supportive Care

STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness

Difficult Airway

Enrolled (actual)
1,100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Intubation Success Rate — 512; 531 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
C-MAC (Device); Glidescope (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Primary completion
Jun 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Intubation Success Rate
512; 531
SECONDARY
Intubation Time
47; 47
SECONDARY
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
482; 398; 41; 146; 8; 11
SECONDARY
Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation
117; 128
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Observed Complications
97; 85

Summary

This study evaluates success rates of tracheal intubation (passing a breathing tube)for patients who may be more challenging to intubate while utilizing one of two devices that facilitate placement of the tube with video technology.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult 18 years of age
  • Mallampati classification scale score of 3 or 4
  • Neck circumference greater than 40cm for males, 38 cm for females
  • mouth opening less than 3cm, but greater than 2cm

Exclusion Criteria

  • children
  • prisoners
  • history of easy intubation (success on first attempt with direct laryngoscopy)
  • known unstable cervical spine injury
  • emergency surgery
  • nasal intubation route
  • planned awake technique
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01632683). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search