Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=130 Randomized Treatment

A Study Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of Labor

Induction of Labor in Multiparous Women

Enrolled (actual)
130
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Time From Induction to Vaginal Delivery — 800; 693 minutes — p=0.11

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Vaginal Misoprostol (Drug); Intravenous Oxytocin (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time From Induction to Vaginal Delivery
800; 693 0.11
SECONDARY
Neonatal APGAR Scores
8; 8; 9; 9
SECONDARY
Neonatal Weight at Delivery
3500; 3415
SECONDARY
Maternal Delivery Outcomes
56; 48; 2; 3; 2; 0
SECONDARY
Maternal Satisfaction With Labor
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Excessive Uterine Activity Necessitating Treatment
9; 4
SECONDARY
NICU Admission and APGAR Less Than 7 at 5 Minutes
8; 4; 0; 0

Summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol (Cytotec) and intravenous oxytocin (Pitocin) in multiparous women who present at term for labor induction.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical candidate for labor induction utilizing either misoprostol or oxytocin
  • Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Multiparous
  • Singleton gestation;
  • Greater than 37 weeks gestation;
  • Cephalic presentation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any clinical contraindication to misoprostol as induction drug
  • Age less than 18 years
  • Contraindication to vaginal birth
  • Nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing
  • Prior uterine surgery
  • Active labor
  • Active maternal bleeding
  • Chorioamnionitis (infection)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01634854). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search