N/A
N=286
Technology Enhanced Community Health Nursing (TECH-N) Study
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01640379 ↗Enrolled (actual)
286
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI) — 6; 13 Participants — p=0.070
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Technology Enhanced Community Health Nursing (Behavioral)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 13+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Positive Sexually Transmitted Infection Test (STI) |
6; 13 | 0.070 |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants That Adhered to Self-treatment |
131; 20 | <0.001 sig |
Summary
The investigators are enrolling 350 young women 13-25 years old diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in Baltimore and randomize them to receive community health nurse (CHN) clinical support using a single post-PID face-to-face clinical evaluation and short messaging system communication support during the 30. The investigators hypothesize that repackaging the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) follow-up visit using a technology-enhanced community health nursing intervention (TECH-N) with integration of an evidence-based sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention curriculum will reduce rates of short-term repeat infection by improving adherence to PID treatment and reducing unprotected intercourse and be more cost-effective compared with outpatient standard of care (and hospitalization).
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Mild-moderate PID
- Outpatient treatment disposition
- Permanently reside in the Baltimore Metropolitan area
- Willing to sign informed consent & be randomized
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant
- Concurrent diagnosis of Sexual Assault
- Unable to communicate/complete study procedures
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01640379). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.