Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=10

Reader Study to Demonstrate That Use of ClearRead Confirm is Superior to the Use Standard AP/PA X-ray Image

Catheters, With or Without Malposition · Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted

Enrolled (actual)
10
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jul 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Time for Completion of Tasks — 27.68; 22.90 seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Georgetown University
Primary completion
Dec 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time for Completion of Tasks
27.68; 22.90
PRIMARY
Accuracy in Detecting the Tips of Tubes, Lines, and Wires.
3.62; 3.96; 3.49; 3.14

Summary

This is a study to determine whether or not a new type of software is, or is not, of benefit. The software, ClearRead Confirm, is designed to enhance the ability of radiologists to detect tubes, lines and wires that may be placed within a patients chest. These types of devices are commonly used for very sick patients in intensive care units and are also used following surgery and in the treatment of cancer. This study will test radiologist's detection of the tips of these devices comparing the results with standard chest radiographs and the the modified chest radiographs. The primary interest is in the time used to interpret the radiograph. We will determine if there is any change in accuracy of detection.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • For the radiologists, they must in in active practice of community radiology (non-university sites).
  • For the cases, they must be patients who have a tube, line, or wire in their chest. A small number of completely normal bedside chest radiographs will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

  • For radiologists: Not in active practice. Working in a university hospital.
  • For cases: children. Do not meet image quality criteria.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01655329). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search