Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=70 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing CD07805/47 Gel 0.5% to Azelaic Acid Gel 15% in Subjects With Erythema of Rosacea

Erythema · Rosacea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01659853 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Composite Success — 14.3; 5.7 percentage of subjects

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and assess the safety of CD07805/47 gel 0.5% applied topically once daily versus azelaic acid gel 15% applied topically twice daily in subjects with moderate to severe facial erythema of rosacea.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Composite Success
14.3; 5.7
SECONDARY
Onset of Action
31.4; 29.4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject is male or female aged 18 years or older.
  • Subject has a clinical diagnosis of facial rosacea.
  • Subject has a clinician's assessment score of moderate to severe erythema prior to enrollment.
  • Subject has a self assessment score of moderate to severe redness prior to enrollment.
  • Subjects with none to mild facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Subjects with a condition or who are in a situation, which in the Investigator's opinion may put a subject at risk, may confound study results, or may interfere with a subject's participation in the study.
  • Subjects with conditions causing facial erythema which would confound the assessment of treatment.
  • Subjects who are taking or have recently taken medications known to have interactions with α2-adrenergic agonists.
  • Subjects with known allergies or sensitivities to one of the components of the investigational products.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01659853). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search