N/A N=148 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cholecystolithiasis

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01667848 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

148

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Apr 2014

Primary outcome: Primary: Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Optitherm® device activated (Device); Optitherm® device inactivated (Device)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Kepler University Hospital
Primary completion: Jul 2013

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)	2.22; 1.92	—
PRIMARY Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)	2.22; 1.92	—
SECONDARY Core Temperature	36.85; 37.07	—
SECONDARY Core Temperature	36.85; 37.07	—

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide Insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with cholecystitis

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01667848). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.