Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=148 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cholecystolithiasis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01667848 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
148
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide Insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)
2.22; 1.92
SECONDARY
Core Temperature
36.85; 37.07

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with cholecystitis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01667848). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search