Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=6 Randomized Basic Science

Assessment of End Expiratory Lung Volumes in Healthy Subjects Using High Flow Oxygen (Vapotherm®)

Healthy Adult Volunteers

Enrolled (actual)
6
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in End-expiratory Lung Volume — -144; 103 mL

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
HFNC (Device); CPAP (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Primary completion
Apr 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in End-expiratory Lung Volume
-144; 103

Summary

Respiratory distress is a common problem in an intensive care unit. There are multiple mechanisms that are used to help patients who are in respiratory distress including mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), high flow oxygen, and oxygen supplementation through nasal cannula or a facemask. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mechanism by which Vapotherm, a high flow oxygen system, provides breathing support. Vapotherm provides high flow oxygen at different flow rates, meaning one can increase the amount of oxygen flow to help with breathing support. The investigators believe that this high flow oxygen system may provide similar breathing support that a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP) machine does.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age between 18 and 75
  • Able to follow and understand simple instructions to collect spirometry

Exclusion Criteria

  • Younger than 18y/o
  • Older than 75 years old
  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • History of asthma
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Measured ratio of forced expiratory volume at 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <70 when undergoing spirometry
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01672242). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search