Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=148 Randomized Treatment

Investigation of Sacroiliac Fusion Treatment (INSITE)

Degenerative Sacroiliitis · Sacroiliac Joint Disruption

Enrolled (actual)
148
Serious AEs
33.8%
Results posted
Aug 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Subject Success — 84; 12 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
iFuse Implant System (Device); Non-surgical management (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
SI-BONE, Inc.
Primary completion
Feb 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Subject Success
84; 12
SECONDARY
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 1 Month
84; 13
SECONDARY
Improvement in Si Joint Pain VAS Score at 3 Months
87; 17
SECONDARY
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 6 Months
84; 12
SECONDARY
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 12 Months
81; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in SI Joint Pain VAS Score at 24 Months
75; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
60; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
60; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
60; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
60; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Back Dysfunction
60; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
11.2; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
11.2; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by SF-36 PCS (Physical Component) at Post-operative Visits
11.2; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
0.29; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
0.29; NA
SECONDARY
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by EQ-5D (EuroQol-5D) at Post-operative Visits
0.29; NA
SECONDARY
Ambulatory Status
60; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Work Status
2; NA
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
38; 12

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes when patients with degenerative sacroiliitis (arthritis of the SI joint) and or sacroiliac disruption (abnormal separation or tearing of the sacroiliac joint)undergo either SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System or undergo specific, targeted non-surgical treatment of the SI joint.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 21-70 at time of screening
  • Patient has lower back pain for >6 months inadequately responsive to conservative care
  • Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint disruption or degenerative sacroiliitis based on ALL of the following:
  • Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and
  • Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for the SI joint (see Table 3), and
  • Patient has improvement in lower back pain numeric rating scale (NRS) of at least 50% after injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (see Section 3.6.4), and
  • One or more of the following:

i. SI joint disruption:

  • Asymmetric SI joint widening on X-ray or CT scan, or
  • Leakage of contrast on diagnostic arthrography

ii. Degenerative sacroiliitis:

  • Radiographic evidence of SI joint degeneration, including sclerosis, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, or vacuum phenomenon on CT or plain film, or
  • Due to prior lumbosacral spine fusion
  • Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30%
  • Baseline SI joint pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 mm visual analog scale*
  • Patient has signed study-specific informed consent form
  • Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture**
  • Other known sacroiliac pathology such as:
  • Sacral dysplasia
  • Inflammatory sacroiliitis (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis or other HLA-associated spondyloarthropathy)
  • Tumor
  • Infection
  • Acute fracture
  • Crystal arthropathy
  • History of recent (<1 year) major trauma to pelvis
  • Previously diagnosed osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score <-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture). Patients meeting the osteoporosis screening criteria identified by the National Osteoporosis Foundation should be screened for osteoporosis with DEXA.**** See Section 3.6.4.
  • Osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic rheumatologic condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible
  • Chondropathy
  • Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys
  • Use of medications known to have detrimental effects on bone quality and soft-tissue healing
  • Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with physical therapy
  • Current local or systemic infection that raises the risk of surgery
  • Patient currently receiving or seeking worker's compensation, disability remuneration, and/or involved in injury litigation.
  • Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 2 years
  • Patient is a prisoner or a ward of the state.
  • Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse***
  • Diagnosed psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation
  • Patient is participating in an investigational study or has been involved in an investigational study within 3 months prior to evaluation for participation
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01681004). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search