N/A
Completed N=117
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01683526 ↗Enrolled (actual)
117
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: First Pass Success Rate — 24; 42 percentage of first pass success
Summary
The safety and efficacy of a video-laryngoscope as a primary intubation tool in urgent endotracheal intubation of critically-ill patients has not been well-described in the literature. This study will answer whether using a VL will impact on the efficacy and safety of intubation compared with a traditional direct laryngoscopy.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY First Pass Success Rate |
24; 42 | — |
| SECONDARY Severe Desaturation |
5; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Hypotension |
8; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Cardiac Arrest |
0; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Complications of Intubation |
9; 6 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by a pulmonary critical care medicine physician
Exclusion Criteria
- Difficult airway
- Oxygen saturation < 92% despite adequate mask ventilation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01683526). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.