Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=251 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate VS Oral Prednisone in Chinese Pediatric and Adolescent Subjects With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma

Asthma

Enrolled (actual)
251
Serious AEs
1.2%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population — 188.77; 188.31 Litres per minute (L/min) — p=0.931

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
fluticasone propionate inhalation solution (Drug); oral prednisone (Drug); placebo inhalation solution (Drug); placebo tablet (Drug); salbutamol (Drug)
Age
Pediatric · 4+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Jun 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (AM PEF) on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
188.77; 188.31 0.931
PRIMARY
Mean Morning PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period in Per Protocol (PP) Population
189.46; 188.96 0.922
SECONDARY
Mean Evening PEF on Diary Card Over the Treatment Assessment Period
195.79; 194.63 0.822
SECONDARY
Median Day-time and Night-time Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Assessment Period
0.5; 1.0; 0.0; 0.0 0.717
SECONDARY
Median Number of Use of Rescue Medications During Day and Night Over the Treatment Assessment Period
2.0; 2.0 0.996
SECONDARY
Clinical Assessment of Lung Function of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) During the Treatment Period
1.288; 1.331; 1.400; 1.396; 1.476; 1.543 0.348
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Scoring Index at Day 5 and Day 8
-2.7; -2.6; -3.4; -3.4 0.507
SECONDARY
Mean Global Evaluation for Efficacy by Participant/Parent and Investigator
1.5; 1.5; 1.5; 1.5 0.633

Summary

This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Chinese male and female pediatric or adolescent subjects aged 4 to 16 years, inclusive
  • Subjects have an established diagnosis of asthma
  • The definition of asthma. According to Chinese Guideline for the diagnosis and optimal management of asthma in children [Respiratory branch of pediatric society,Chinese Medical. Association. 2008, revised version], the subjects can be diagnosed when meeting the criteria. The diagnosis criteria is listed in the protocol.
  • The severity of an acute exacerbation of asthma is defined as PEF of 50% to 75% predicted via a peak flow meter, with a clinical scoring index of ≥2. The clinical scoring index represents the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate (0=low to 3=high, dependent on age), wheezing (0=none to 3=severe), inspiration/expiration ratio (0=2:1 to 3=1:3), and accessory muscle (0=none to 3=marked use).
  • Subjects can properly use a mini-wright peak flow meter, nebulizer and MDI with/without a spacer, and accurately complete a diary card with parental assistance, if required.
  • Subjects' parents/guardians are willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe respiratory dysfunction.
  • History of mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure.
  • Admission to hospital due to respiratory disease within the previous 2 weeks, including asthmatic exacerbations.
  • Clinical or lab evidence of a serious, uncontrolled systemic disease or presence of any disease likely to interfere with the objectives of this study, such as pulmonary cystic fibrosis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to glucocorticosteroids or β2 agonists.
  • Clinical visual evidence of oral candidiasis at Visit1.
  • Use of the medications below in Table 1 according to the following defined time intervals prior to presentation. The list is provided in the protocol.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01687296). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search