N/A
N=11
Prescribe Exercise for Prevention of Falls and Fractures: A Family Health Team Approach
Fall and Fractures Prevention
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01698463 ↗Enrolled (actual)
11
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Physical Activity (Reporting Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to Six-week Follow-up) — 21.6 minutes/day
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Identification of patients at risk, tailored exercise prescription, motivational interviewing, review of behavioural outcomes (Other)
- Age
- Older Adult · 65+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Waterloo
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Physical Activity (Reporting Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to Six-week Follow-up) |
21.6 | — |
| PRIMARY Physical Activity (Self-report) (Reporting Change in Physical Activity From Baseline to Six-week Follow-up) |
65.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Behavior Change Outcome: Action Planning |
21.00 | — |
| SECONDARY Behavior Change Outcome: Coping Planning |
14.55 | — |
| SECONDARY Behavior Change Outcome: Coping Self-Efficacy |
34.45 | — |
| SECONDARY Behavior Change Outcome: Intentions |
12.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) |
8.0 | <0.05 sig |
Summary
Falls and fractures are a leading cause of death and disability in the older adult population. The consequences of falls and fractures contribute substantially to health care costs and can have a significant negative impact on the quality of life of the individual. Exercise has been studied as an option to reduce fracture risk and prevent falls though improving balance and muscle strength. The prevention of falls is important, as a history of falls is strongly predictive of suffering another. Those who are at a high risk of fracture or falling require a patient specific assessment and individualized exercise prescription that is tailored to their needs. This kind of program may not be typically available within the community and at a low cost. These individuals may experience difficulty when trying to engage in exercise due to barriers such as a lack of transportation, and a lack of knowledge. As the first point of contact with the health care system for many family doctors are in the ideal position to deliver exercise advice to their patients. However, a lack of time and specialized skills in prescribing exercise make this difficult for many of them. As a result, family health teams who provide interdisciplinary patient centered care are becoming popular. In this model the care is shared and provided by the most appropriate team member (e.g. doctor, nurse, exercise specialist). Additionally, many exercise interventions do not include a behavior change aspect, which may be an important component when trying to get individuals to engage in a new health behavior like exercise. Therefore the purpose of this project is to assess the feasibility of implementing a tailored exercise program to those at high risk of falls or fractures over the age of 65 in a primary care setting using an interdisciplinary model of care that is based on a health behaviour change model.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- > age 65
- Patient of the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team (CFFM FHT)
Have at least one of the following:
- 2 or more falls in the past 12 months
- age 75 +
- high risk of fracture based on the CAROC
- difficulty with walking or balance as determined by attending physician
- acute fall
- history of a fragility fracture after the age of 50
Exclusion Criteria
- moderate to severe cognitive impairment
- moderate to severe neurologic impairment
- not able to communicate in English
- contraindications to exercise as determined by physician
- uncontrolled hypertension
- palliative care, current cancer, on dialysis
- participation in a similar exercise program including resistance training at least 3 times a week
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01698463). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.